Dismissed

M/s. Pearl community One Developers Pvt. Limited v. Mr.Praveen Manavalan

Madras HC12 Nov 2025Arb O.P(COM.DIV.)/560/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras dismissed an original petition and a connected application seeking to set aside an arbitral award for non-prosecution, noting the petitioners' failure to file required affidavits and their attempts to delay proceedings via lame excuses.

What did the court decide?

The petition praying to set aside the award dated 11.04.2025 is dismissed for non-prosecution.

M/s. Pearl community One Developers Pvt. Limited Vs Mr.Praveen… — Arbitration | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

Arbitration Original Petition (Com.Div.) No.560 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 12.11.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

Arbitration Original Petition (Com.Div.) No.560 of 2025 and

¶7

A.No.4551 of 2025

¶8

1.M/s.Pearl Community One Developers Pvt. Limited,

¶9

represented by its Managing Director, Mr.Maurius Anton Chrislyn Cardoza, Old No.33, New No.8/1, Haudin Road, Bengaluru – 560 042.

¶10

2.Maurius Anton Chrislyn Cardoza .... Petitioners

¶11

Vs.

¶12

Praveen Manavalan represented by its power Agent Mrs.Tharini Manavalan Flat No.1A, Ramaniyam Saraswathi, B-17, 22^nd Cross Street, Besant Nagar, Chennai – 600 090.

¶13

.... Respondent

¶14

Arbitration Original Petition (Com.Div.) filed under Section 34(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to set aside the award dated 11.04.2025 in Arb.O.P.No.428 of 2023 passed by the sole Arbitrator in its entirety.

¶15

For Petitioners : Mr.Adeesh Anto for Mr.S.Marimuthu

¶16

For Respondent : Mr.S.Arjun Suresh and Mr.Anisha Gupta

¶17

*****

¶18

1/4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

Arbitration Original Petition (Com.Div.) No.560 of 2025

¶21

ORDER

¶22

This petition was filed under Section 34(4) of the Arbitration

¶23

and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to set aside the award dated 11.04.2025 in Arb.O.P.No.428 of 2023 passed by the sole Arbitrator in its entirety.

¶24

When the matter was taken up for hearing today, learned

¶25

counsel for petitioners submitted that the second petitioner met with an accident and therefore, once again sought for time.

¶26

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 10.11.2025,

¶27

this Court passed the following order:

¶28

“In spite of the earlier order passed by this Court on 07.11.2025, till date no affidavit has been filed.

¶29

There is no representation for the petitioner.

¶30

Post this application under the caption “for dismissal” on 12.11.2025.”

¶31

When the matter is listed under the caption 'for dismissal', the

¶32

petitioner is expected to get ready with the matter and comply with the earlier directions issued by this Court. This Court is able to see that the petitioners are only trying to drag on the proceedings by giving lame

¶33

2/4

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

Arbitration Original Petition (Com.Div.) No.560 of 2025

¶36

excuses. Since the matter is listed under the caption 'for dismissal' and the petitioner is not effectively prosecuting this petition and is also not complying with the earlier directions issued by this Court, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, connected application is closed.

¶37

12.11.2025

¶38

Index:yes/no NCC:yes/no Speaking Order/Non-speaking order gm

¶39

3/4

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

Arbitration Original Petition (Com.Div.) No.560 of 2025

¶42

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.

¶43

¶44

Arbitration Original Petition (Com.Div.) No.560 of 2025

¶45

12.11.2025

¶46

4/4

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M/s. Pearl community One Developers Pvt. Limited v. Mr.Praveen Manavalan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Pearl community One Developers Pvt. Limited v. Mr.Praveen Manavalan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Sri Sai Balaji Gas Cylinders Ltd, Rep.by its Managing Director, Mr.M.Muruganandam, Vs Mr.D Bala Ravi Chandrudu, S/o. D.Bala Raju

Geetha Priya Vs the District Collector

Vishnu Lakshmi College of Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

M/S.Prakash International, Vs the Intelligence Officer (Ci)

M.Chinnasami, Vs Mr. Dinesh Ponraj Aliver and 4 others

M/s. Njr Constructions Pvt. Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director Mr.N.Janardhana Rao, Vs Union of India, Cpwd