Disposed

Muthusamy. P v. The Commissioner

Madras HC16 Apr 2024WP(MD)/9284/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking mandamus for a fair trial and expedition of O.A.No.13 of 2022 before the Joint Commissioner, HR&CE Department. Court directed expeditious disposal within 120 days after hearing petitioner and private respondents; no orders on merits.

What did the court decide?

Second respondent directed to dispose of O.A.No.13 of 2022 preferably within 120 days after hearing petitioner and private respondents.

Muthusamy. P Vs The Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.9284 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 16.04.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.9284 of 2024 and W.M.P.(MD) No.8445 of 2024

P.Muthusamy

... Petitioner

/vs./

1.The Commissioner,

¶11

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Chennai -34.

¶12

2.The Joint Commissioner,

¶13

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Trichirappalli -5.

¶14

3.The Assistant Commissioner,

¶15

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Trichirapppalli -5.

¶16

4.P.Thangaraj

¶17

5.P.Arumugam

¶18

6.C.Pichai

¶19

7.P.Senthil Kumar

¶20

1/5

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

W.P.(MD) No.9284 of 2024

8.M.Karupiah

9.M.Veeramani

10.M.Bala Murugan

11.C.Sakthivel

12.P.Kathiresan

... Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2^nd respondent to conduct a fair and decorous trial in O.A.No. 13 of 2022 by following the stipulated under the law and consequently direct the 2^nd respondent to expedite the case in O.A.No. 13/2022.

¶30

For Petitioner : M/s.K.Renga Bathagadevi

¶31

For R1 to R3 : Mr.P.T.Thiraviam Government Advocate (Crl.side)

¶32

For R4 to R12 : Mr.A.Joel Paul Antony

¶33

ORDER

¶34

Heard M/s.K.Renga Bathagadevi, learned counsel for the petitioner,

¶35

Mr.P.T.Thiraviam, learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr.A.Joel Paul Antony, learned counsel for the respondents 4 to 12.

¶36

2/5

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

W.P.(MD) No.9284 of 2024

¶39

2.The writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus to direct the second respondent to conduct a fair and decorous trial in O.A.No.13 of 2022 under law and to direct the second respondent to expedite the case in O.A.No.13/2022.

¶40

3.The learned counsel for the respondents 4 to 12 would submit that he would like to file a counter. He would further submit that the respondents 4 to 12 have also filed an application to implead themselves in the proceedings that are pending before the second respondent in O.A.No.13 of 2022.

¶41

4.I am of the view that this Writ Petition can be disposed of, as no adverse orders are proposed to be passed on merits except to direct the second respondent to dispose of O.A.No.13 of 2022 as expeditiously as possible after hearing the petitioner and the private respondents herein, who appeared to have filed applications for impleading themselves in the proceedings that are pending before the second respondent in O.A.No.13 of 2022.

¶42

5.Considering the above, the Writ Petition stands disposed of by directing the second respondent to dispose of O.A.No.13 of 2022 as expeditiously as

¶43

3/5

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

W.P.(MD) No.9284 of 2024

¶46

possible, preferably within a period of 120 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after hearing the petitioner as well as the private respondents herein as well.

¶47

No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶48

Index : Yes / No 16.04.2024 Internet : Yes / No mm To 1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Chennai -34. 2.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Trichirappalli -5. 3.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Trichirapppalli -5.

¶49

4/5

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶51

W.P.(MD) No.9284 of 2024

¶52

C.SARAVANAN, J.

¶53

¶54

W.P.(MD) No.9284 of 2024

¶55

16.04.2024

¶56

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶57

5/5

Muthusamy. P v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muthusamy. P v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Chandrasekarapuram Co-op Vs The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax

Tvl Rajaiah Contractor Vs The Deputy State Tax Officer II

Tvl.Reshee Super Stores Vs The Union of India

Theiventhiran Vs The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat)

Ntc Infrastructure And Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commercial Tax Officer

Ramani Vs The Commissioner of Commercial Tax