Quashed

Tvl.Reshee Super Stores v. The Union of India

Madras HC15 Apr 2024WP(MD)/8577/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court quashed an assessment order passed under Section 73 of the TN-GST Act as it failed to consider the petitioner's detailed reply submitted during personal hearings. The matter was remitted to the tax authorities to pass a fresh order on merits within 90 days, ensuring the petitioner's reply is considered.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order quashed and case remitted to the 3rd respondent to pass a fresh order on merits within 90 days, considering the petitioner's reply.

Tvl.Reshee Super Stores Vs The Union of India — GST and Indirect Tax | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.8577 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 15.04.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.8577 of 2024 &

¶7

W.M.P.(MD).Nos.7817 and 7820 of 2024

¶8

Tvl.RESHEE SUPER STORES Rep by its Partner P.S.Gunasekaran 53, Lakshmipuram 4^th street Madurai-625 001 ... Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

1 The Union of India Rep by its Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, No. 137, North Block, New Delhi - 110001.

¶11

2 The Goods and Service Tax Council, Rep by its Chairman, GST Council Secretariat, 5th Floor, Tower II, Jeevan Bharti Building, Janpath Road, Connaught Place, New Delhi-110001.

¶12

3 The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Secretary to Government, Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Secretariat, Fort St George, Chennai -600009.

¶13

4 Principal Secretary / Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Commercial Taxes Department, Ezhiligam, Chepauk, Chennai- 600005.

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ____________ Page No. 1 of 6_

¶15

W.P.(MD) No.8577 of 2024

¶16

5 The State Tax Officer / Audit Officer,

¶17

Vengalakadai Street Circle, Madurai - 20.

¶18

6 The State Tax Officer Munichalai Road Circle, Madurai - 20. ... Respondents

¶19

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the file of the 1^st respondent in Notification No. 09/2023 - Central Tax dated 31-03-2023 the records on the file of the 3^rd respondent in G.O Ms.No. 41 and quash the Notification dated 05-04-2023 issued therein and the records on the files of the 6^th respondent in GSTN:33AAPFR9277H1ZK/2017-18 dated 31.12.2023 and quash the same as manifestly arbitrary, void, contrary to

¶20

the provision of Section 168A of the Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and illegal without jurisdiction and against the Principles of Natural Justice.

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Chandrasekaran For Respondents : Mr.G.Rajaraman, CGSC for R1

¶22

Mr.R.Suresh Kumar, AGP for R3 to 6

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ____________ Page No. 2 of 6_

¶24

W.P.(MD) No.8577 of 2024

¶25

O R D E R

¶26

Writ Petition is filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the file of the 1^st respondent in Notification No. 09/2023 - Central Tax dated 31-03-2023 the records on the file of the 3rd respondent in G.O Ms.No. 41 and quash the Notification dated 05-04-2023 issued therein and the records on the files of the 6th respondent in GSTIN:33AAPFR9277H1ZK/2017-18 dated 31.12.2023 and quash the same as manifestly arbitrary, void, contrary to the provision of Section 168A of the Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.

¶27

Petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order passed by the 6^th respondent in GSTIN:33AAPFR9277H1ZK/2017-18 dated 31.12.2023 for the assessment year 2017-2018. Operative portion of the impugned order reads as under:

¶28

“ The reply of the taxable person was carefully considered. Personal hearing was afforded to them. They attended the personal hearing and explained their view with regard to the discrepancies. Based on the reply and available records, the adjudication order is passed under section 73 of TN-GST Act as follows:

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

Page No. 3 of 6

¶31

W.P.(MD) No.8577 of 2024

¶32

Quantification:

¶33

Tax
IGST	CGST	SGST
Deliberately
left blank

¶34

Abstract:

¶35

Tax in Rs	Interest	Penalty
	Deliberately left
	blank

¶36

Order in “DRC-07” is issued through common portal.

¶37

Note: The interest has been calculated as on the

¶38

date of passing the adjudication order. While making payment, interest for the subsequent period also to be calculated u/s. 50(1) of CGST Act @ 18% per annum.”

¶39

It is noticed that the impugned order has preceded the order and a show cause notice dated 27.09.2023 in DRC-01 and personal hearing held on 23.11.2023 and 25.12.2023. The petitioner appears to have given a detailed reply dated 26.12.2023 at the time of personal hearing. However, the content of the reply of the petitioner has not been considered while passing the impugned order by the 3^rd respondent. As such the impugned order is arbitrary and is therefore liable to be quashed. Accordingly, the

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

Page No. 4 of 6

¶42

W.P.(MD) No.8577 of 2024

¶43

impugned order is quashed and case is remitted back to the 3^rd respondent

¶44

to pass a fresh order on merits within a period of 90 days. Before passing the order petitioner's reply dated 26.12.2023 shall be considered. Petitioner may file additional reply if any within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Impugned order which stands quashed shall be treated as corrigendum to show cause notice dated 27.09.2023 in DRC-01.

¶45

Writ Petition is disposed of with the above observation. No costs. Consequently, connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶46

15.04.2024.

¶47

Index: Yes/ No Neutral Citation: Yes / No kpr Copy To:

¶48

1 The Secretary, The Union of India Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, No. 137, North Block, New Delhi - 110001.

¶49

2 The Chairman, Goods and Service Tax Council, Secretariat, 5th Floor, Tower II, Jeevan Bharti Building, Janpath Road, Connaught Place, New Delhi-110001.

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶51

Page No. 5 of 6

¶52

W.P.(MD) No.8577 of 2024

¶53

C.SARAVANAN, J.

¶54

kpr

¶55

3 The Secretary to Government,

¶56

State of Tamil Nadu

¶57

Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Secretariat, Fort St George, Chennai -600009.

¶58

4 Principal Secretary / Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,

¶59

Commercial Taxes Department, Ezhiligam,

¶60

Chepauk, Chennai- 600005.

¶61

5 The State Tax Officer

¶62

Vengalakadai Street Circle, Madurai - 20.

¶63

6 The State Tax Officer

¶64

Munichalai Road Circle, Madurai - 20.

¶65

W.P.(MD) No.8577 of 2024

¶66

15.04.2024

¶67

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ____________ Page No. 6 of 6_

Tvl.Reshee Super Stores v. The Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tvl.Reshee Super Stores v. The Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satheesh. M Vs The District Collector

Samundeeswari Vs The Commissioner

Malmurugan S Vs The Joint Commissioner

The Chandrasekarapuram Co-op Vs The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax

Tvl Rajaiah Contractor Vs The Deputy State Tax Officer II

Tvl.Sri Rahaventhar Industries Vs Union Of India