Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quashing of an order and reinstatement in service. The counsel requested withdrawal, which was permitted. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.9145 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 08.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P.(MD)No.9145 of 2019 in
W.M.P.(MD)No.7122 of 2019
V.Radhakrishnan
... Petitioner
versus
Kannyakumari District.
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the documents pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent vide Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.1752/2018/A2 dated 27.03.2019 and quash the same as illegal and consequently, direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service forthwith.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.P.Narayanakumar
1/3
W.P.(MD)No.9145 of 2019
For R1 : Mr.Shankar Ganesh
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, he seeks for a permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
08.11.2024
ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No.
To
The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment, Suchindram, Kannyakumari District.
2/3
W.P.(MD)No.9145 of 2019
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
ogy
W.P.(MD)No.9145 of 2019
08.11.2024
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V. Radhakrishnan
The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment
Sree Kaariyam (Manager), Ponmanai Devasthanam
B. PUGALENDHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
