The defacto complainant sought cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the accused, alleging they failed to return documents as undertaken during mediation. The Court held that the earlier bail order contained no such condition or reference to the return of certificates. Consequently, the petition for cancellation was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.P(MD) No.10614 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Eighth day of November Two Thousand and Twenty Four
PRESENT
The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
Crl.M.P(MD) No.10614 of 2024 in Crl.O.P(MD) No.8069 of 2024
P.NAGALAKSHMI ... PETITIONER/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT
Vs
1 R.PRADEEP
2 R. VALARMATHI
3 SUGANTHI ...RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3/PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SATTUR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. CRIME NO. 15/2024
...4th RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to cancel the Anticipatory bail granted in favour of the Respondents/petitioners accused No.1 to 3 in Crl.OP(MD) No. 8069/2024 dated 20.06.2024 and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court.
1/3
Crl.M.P(MD) No.10614 of 2024
Order : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.P.SARAVANAKUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.S.KOSHORE, Advocate for the Respondents 1 to 3 and MR.P.KOTTAI CHAMY, Government Advocate(Crl.side) on behalf of the Respondent No.4 , the court made the following order:-
This petition has been filed by the Defecto complainant seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the accused 1 to 3 in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8069 of 2024.
2/3
Crl.M.P(MD) No.10614 of 2024
sd/-
08/11/2024
/ TRUE COPY /
/11/2024
Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
OGY
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE-I, SATTUR.
2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,
SATTUR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. C.C. to M/s.P.KALAIYARASI BHARATHI Advocate SR.No.63863 (F) DT.11/11/2024
ORDER
IN CRL MP(MD) No.10614 of 2024 IN CRL OP(MD) No.8069 of 2024 Date :08/11/2024
SA/GSV/SAR. /22.11.2024/3P/6C
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023.
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail granted to the accused in a matrimonial dispute requires cancellation on the ground of non-return of certificates?
P.NAGALAKSHMI
R.PRADEEP
R. VALARMATHI
SUGANTHI
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SATTUR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT
B.Pugalendhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
