Dismissed

Revinraj v. The Director of Town Panchayat

Madras HC3 Jun 2024WP(MD)/2949/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The applicant presented a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash an order and direct continuation of a job as a sanitary lorry driver. The petitioner was not represented at hearings on the specified dates. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

Revinraj Vs The Director of Town Panchayat — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD).No.2949 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 03.06.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

¶6

W.P.(MD).No.2949 of 2021 and

¶7

W.M.P.(MD)No.2381 of 2021

Revinraj

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Director of Town Panchayat, Kuralagam, Chennai.

¶12

2.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, At Nagercoil.

¶13

3.The Assistant Director of Panchayat, Collectorate Office, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

¶14

4.The Executive Officer, Mandaicadu Town Panchayat, Mandaicadu and Post, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents

¶15

1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.(MD).No.2949 of 2021

¶17

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Na.Ka.No.11795/2018/P5 on the file of the 3^rd respondent dated 16.03.2020 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to allow the petitioner in continuing the same job as sanitary lorry driver of the 4^th respondent Panchayat.

¶18

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.D.Gandhiraj, Special Government Pleader

¶19

ORDER

¶20

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 12.04.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today i.e., on 03.06.2024 under the caption “For Dismissal”. Even today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

¶21

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

W.P.(MD).No.2949 of 2021

¶23

Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution. There shall

¶24

be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶25

03.06.2024

¶26

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes Sml

¶27

¶28

1.The Director of Town Panchayat, Kuralagam, Chennai.

¶29

2.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, At Nagercoil.

¶30

3.The Assistant Director of Panchayat, Collectorate Office, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

¶31

4.The Executive Officer, Mandaicadu Town Panchayat, Mandaicadu and Post, Kanyakumari District.

¶32

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

W.P.(MD).No.2949 of 2021

¶34

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

¶35

Sml

¶36

W.P.(MD).No.2949 of 2021

¶37

03.06.2024

¶38

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Revinraj v. The Director of Town Panchayat

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Revinraj v. The Director of Town Panchayat

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamalarasan Vs The Inspector of Police

R. Thiruganasambandam Vs The Inspector of Police

Thangadruaipandian Vs The Inspector of Police

Mohanraj Vs Rameshwari

Chinnavar Vs Chandran

P.Subramaniam M/a Vs Idol Sri Arulmigukalyana Pasupatheeswaraswamy