Petitioners sought revision of an interlocutory order in a pending suit but failed to appear on two hearing dates. The High Court dismissed the civil revision petition for non-prosecution and closed the connected miscellaneous petition, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(MD)No.598 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 03.06.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
C.R.P.(MD)No.598 of 2020 and C.M.P.(MD)No.3810 of 2020
1.Chinnavar
2.Krishnakumar ... Petitioners / Petitioners / Defendants
Vs.
Chandran ... Respondent / Respondent / Plaintiff
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of CPC, to call for the records and set aside the fair and decretal order dated 22.01.2019 made in I.A.No.697 of 2018 in O.S.No.249 of 2013 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Uthamapalayam and consequently allow the civil revision petition.
For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.R.Murugan
C.R.P.(MD)No.598 of 2020
ORDER
When the civil revision petition was taken up for hearing on 15.04.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today i.e., on 03.06.2024 under the caption “For Dismissal”. Even today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
03.06.2024
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes Sml
To
1.The District Munsif, Uthamapalayam.
2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Record Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
C.R.P.(MD)No.598 of 2020
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
Sml
C.R.P.(MD)No.598 of 2020
03.06.2024
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chinnavar
Krishnakumar
Chandran
L.Victoria Gowri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
