Dismissed

Jeyakumar .B v. The Tahsildar

Madras HC10 Dec 2024WP(MD)/15677/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court directed the Tahsildar and Surveyor to survey and demarcate the petitioner's property in Dindigul District based on a pending online application. The Court issued detailed procedural safeguard directions regarding notices, objections, and restriction on fencing and dispossession during the survey process.

What did the court decide?

Directions issued to survey authorities to conduct survey within guidelines; petition disposed of.

Jeyakumar .B Vs The Tahsildar — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.15677 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 10.12.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.15677 of 2023

B.Jeyakumar

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Tahsildar, Vedasendur Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶11

2.The Firka Surveyor, Vedasendur Taluk, Dindigul District. ...Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to survey and demarcate the four boundaries by planting survey stones in S.No.806/3B1 situated at Kuttam Village, Vedasendur Taluk, Dindigul District based on the online application vide Challan No.20230510016987, dated 10.05.2023 within stipulated time as fixed by this Court.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sarvagan Prabhu

¶14

For Respondents : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam Government Advocate

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/7

¶17

W.P.(MD)No.15677 of 2023

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to survey and demarcate the petitioner's property in S.No.806/3B1, at Kuttam Village, Vedasendur Taluk, Dindigul District, by considering the petitioner's online application, dated 10.05.2023.

¶20

2. The subject property in S.No.806/3B1, at Kuttam Village, Vedasendur Taluk, Dindigul District, originally belonged to the petitioner's mother, Rengammal, under registered sale deed, dated 17.09.1992. The petitioner's father died on 05.07.2008, and subsequently his mother died on 31.01.2015. After the demise of the petitioner's parents, the petitioner and his brother as their legal heirs became entitled to the property. The petitioner and his brother wanted to partition the property. The petitioner therefore applied for survey of lands vide online application, dated 10.05.2023, along with necessary fee. As no action was taken on the petitioner's application, the petitioner filed the above writ petition for the aforesaid relief.

¶21

3. Normally, this Court would not entertain the writ for Mandamus in the absence of representation, but in the present case, as the petitioner's application is kept pending since May 2023, I am inclined to issue direction to the respondents to conduct survey and demarcate the petitioner's property.

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

2/7

¶24

W.P.(MD)No.15677 of 2023

¶25

4. With the consent of both learned counsels, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal. If any person is aggrieved by this order, it is open to them to move this Court either by way of review or recall of this order, if there is any suppression of material facts by the petitioner.

¶26

This Court in W.P(MD)No.12676 of 2024, dated 14.06.2024 issued certain directions for considering the application for survey and fixing of boundary. Following the said order, the following directions are issued:

¶27

(I) The petitioner is directed to submit his / her application in online mode. The survey authority will scrutinize if the application submitted by the petitioner is in order. Patta need not be in the name of the applicant. If patta is in the name of the vendor and

¶28

mutation has not been effected, still the application can be considered.

¶29

(II) The petitioner will have to enclose all the relevant documents such as patta. The applicant must have individual patta in his / her name. If he / she is having joint patta, co-pattadars must give their consent for conducting survey.

¶30

(III) The survey authority will issue notice to the writ petitioner

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

3/7

¶33

W.P.(MD)No.15677 of 2023

¶34

as well as the adjacent land owners and also to the interested persons, if any.

¶35

(IV) Enquiry shall be held. During enquiry, objections raised by the adjacent land owners / interested persons shall be considered. (V) If according to the jurisdictional authority, the objections are without any basis, the same shall be overruled and the objectors shall be informed accordingly. But the survey will be conducted only after a period of six weeks so that the objector can move the concerned Court for injunction. If before the proposed date of survey, the objector is unable to obtain any injunction order, the survey can very well go on.

¶36

(VI) It is open to the parties to serve memo of instructions to the surveyor at the time of conducting survey. The same will be borne in mind. While it cannot be binding on the surveyor, the same will be taken note of.

¶37

(VII) If the jurisdictional authority finds objections to be having substance, then, he shall call upon the applicant to move the jurisdictional civil Court for agitating his rights.

¶38

(VIII) If required, the survey authority is empowered to seek aid of the jurisdictional police and the jurisdictional police are

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

4/7

¶41

W.P.(MD)No.15677 of 2023

¶42

mandated to grant police protection.

¶43

(IX) It is made clear that at the end of the survey exercise, survey stones alone can be installed. The exercise of survey and demarcation undertaken pursuant to the direction of this Court can never result in dispossession of any party. If the petitioner wants to put up fencing and if there is any objection from any private party, fencing can be put up only after the petitioner obtains decree from the jurisdictional Civil Court.

¶44

(X) The survey authority will conclude the entire exercise one way or the other as per seniority of applications after service of notice on the interested persons.

¶45

(XI) A copy of the survey report along with sketch will be served on the parties. No costs.

¶46

5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. No

¶47

costs.

¶48

10.12.2024

¶49

NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no SN

¶50

To:

¶51

1.The Tahsildar,

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶53

5/7

¶54

W.P.(MD)No.15677 of 2023

¶55

Vedasendur Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶56

2.The Firka Surveyor, Vedasendur Taluk, Dindigul District

¶57

N.MALA, J.

¶58

¶59

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶60

6/7

¶61

W.P.(MD)No.15677 of 2023

¶62

W.P.(MD)No.15677 of 2023

¶63

10.12.2024

¶64

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶65

7/7

Jeyakumar .B v. The Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jeyakumar .B v. The Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sriman Natana Gopalanayaki Swamikal Sabhai, Vs Palanikumar

Nallamuthu.M Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer (Rdo)

Murugan.S Vs The Thasildhar

P.Suryalingam Vs The District Collector

Maasu @ Masanam Vs The District Collector

Ajmalkhan Vs The Tahsildar