Disposed

P. Ravichandran, v. the Superintending Engineer

Madras HC20 Nov 2024WP(MD)/11579/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition praying for disconnecting an electricity connection granted to a co-sharer during a pendency of a partition suit, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed the petition with liberty to renew the claim after disposal of the underlying civil suit.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed with liberty to renew claim after disposal of the underlying civil suit. No order as to costs.

P. Ravichandran, Vs the Superintending Engineer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.11579 of 2015

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 20.11.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.11579 of 2015

P.Ravichandran

.. Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO (Operation and Maintenance), TNEB Complex, Race Course Road, Madurai-625 002.

¶11

2.The Assistant Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO (Operation and Maintenance), Market Road, K.Pudur, Madurai-625 007.

¶12

3.The Assistant Engineer, TANGEDCO (Operation and Maintenance), Kadachanenthal, Madurai-625 107.

¶13

4.R.Raja .. Respondents

¶14

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the proceedings of the third respondent in Ka.No. Umi.Po./Pa/Kadath/Ko PuManu/A.No.145/2015 dated 26.06.2015 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to remove the

¶15

_________Page 1 of 4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.(MD) No.11579 of 2015

¶18

electricity connection in SC.No.108016257, provided to the fourth respondent through the property of the petitioner in Survey No.23/12 situated at Maranivariyenthal Village, Madurai District.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Jameel Arasu For R1 to R3 : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel For R4 : Mr.M.Saravanakumar

¶20

ORDER

¶21

The present writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to disconnect the electricity connection granted in favour of the fourth respondent.

¶22

It has been brought to the notice of this Court that with regard to the property for which the service connection had been effected, a civil suit in O.S.No.256 of 2015 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Melur had been filed at the instance of the writ petitioner, which is a suit for partition.

¶23

_________Page 2 of 4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.(MD) No.11579 of 2015

¶26

In view of the same, as and when the suit is disposed of and

¶27

based upon the judgment and decree in the civil suit, the petitioner can renew his claim in accordance with law.

¶28

With the aforesaid liberty, this Writ Petition stands disposed of.

¶29

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶30

20.11.2024

¶31

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes

¶32

abr

¶33

¶34

1.The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO (Operation and Maintenance), TNEB Complex, Race Course Road, Madurai-625 002.

¶35

2.The Assistant Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO (Operation and Maintenance), Market Road, K.Pudur, Madurai-625 007.

¶36

3.The Assistant Engineer, TANGEDCO (Operation and Maintenance), Kadachanenthal, Madurai-625 107.

¶37

_________Page 3 of 4

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

W.P.(MD) No.11579 of 2015

¶40

K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

¶41

abr

¶42

W.P.(MD) No.11579 of 2015

¶43

Dated: 20.11.2024

¶44

_________Page 4 of 4

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

P. Ravichandran, v. the Superintending Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Ravichandran, v. the Superintending Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Santhanam, Vs the Collector

K.Suthanthira Bharathi, Vs the Rdo

P.Sivakumar, Ex-Secretary, Vs the Deputy Registrar of

Muthu Cotton Mills Vs the Tamilnadu Generation and

K. Chokkar Vs the Superintendent Engineer

The Southern India Mills Vs Tamil Nadu Generation and