V.Santhanam, v. the Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged refusal to handover temple keys. Court held petition infructuous as petitioner is a member of the temple management committee. Writ petition closed with no costs.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed; no order as to costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
W.P.(MD) No.3663 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 19.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU
W.P.(MD) No.3663 of 2017 and W.M.P.(MD)No.2941 of 2017
V.Santhanam,
.. Petitioner
Vs.
- The Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.
- The Tahsildar, Tiruchendur Taluk Office, Tiruchendur, Thoothukudi District.
- A.Ayyansamy .. Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to consider petitioners representation dated 03.02.2017 to direct the 3rd respondent to handover the key to the Executive Committee of the Ayya Vaigundasamy Nilalthangal Temple, Mookuperi, Thoothukudi District and further direct the facilitate the Devotees to worship and to conduct all festivals as per the decision of Executive Committee.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.Santhanam
- respondent
The Collector, Thoothukudi District
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Tiruchendur Taluk Office
- respondent
A.Ayyansamy
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court