Disposed

Shameem Begum v. the District Revenue Officer

Madras HC3 Apr 2024WP/8769/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition filed by Shameem Begum challenging a revenue order. The High Court, without deciding merits, directed the respondents to enquire if other legal heirs of the deceased's brother survived, and heard them before modifying the Patta.

What did the court decide?

Direct the respondents to enquire legal heirs of the deceased and hear them before passing any orders on the representation.

Shameem Begum Vs the District Revenue Officer — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

WP.No.8769 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 03.04.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

WP.No.8769 of 2024

Shameem Begum

.. Petitioner

Versus

1.The District Revenue Officer Krishnagiri District First Floor-Collectorate Krishnagiri – 635 115

¶11

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer G-6, F-8 POP Bangalore Road Veerappa Nagar Krishnagiri – 635 001

¶12

3.The Tahsildar Taluk Office Bargur – 635 104 Krishnagiri District .. Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to consider the representation dated 09.02.2024 of the petitioner and after making modification in the Patta HSD No.194/(40) issue modified Patta to Nattam Porombokku land comprised at Krishnagiri District, Bargur Taluk, Mallapadi Village vide Survey No.795/44.

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/4

¶16

WP.No.8769 of 2024

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Deivasigamani For Respondent : Mr.A.Selvendran Special Government Pleader

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to consider the

¶20

representation of the petitioner to issue patta.

¶21

It is the grievance of the petitioner that patta originally stood in the name of his brother. Since, he has died on 15.09.2020, the petitioner name should brought in the patta proceedings.

¶22

Mr.A.Selvendran, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents.

¶23

Heard both sides and perused the materials placed on record. Considering the limited relief sought for in this writ petition, this Court without going into the merits of the case, directs the respondents to enquire the matter and if they found any legal heirs are left by the deceased Aslam, they shall also be heard before passing any orders. Such exercise shall be completed within a

¶24

period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.

¶25

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

2/4

¶28

dhk

¶29

dhk Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No

WP.No.8769 of 2024

03.04.2024

To,

1.The District Revenue Officer Krishnagiri District First Floor-Collectorate Krishnagiri – 635 115

¶34

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Bangalore Road Veerappa Nagar Krishnagiri – 635 001

¶35

3.The Tahsildar Taluk Office Bargur – 635 104 Krishnagiri District

¶36

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3/4

WP.No.8769 of 2024

dhk

W.P.No.8769 of 2024

03.04.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

4/4

Shameem Begum v. the District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shameem Begum v. the District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Porappa Gowndar Vs the District Collector, Collectorate

Jayanthi Vs the District Collector

Jayanthi Vs the District Collector

Sakunthala Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

M.S. Raghavendran Vs the Inspector General of Registration

M.Vimalan Vs the District Collector