Disposed

N.Seetharaman v. the District Collector

Madras HC12 Sept 2024WP/26652/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226, the petitioner sought issuance of patta for his property. The respondent Government Advocate submitted that the petitioners representation would be considered. This Court directed the First Respondent to consider the petitioners representation dated 08.07.2023, issue notice, and pass final orders within eight weeks, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner shall be directed to issue notice and consider the petitioners representation dated 08.07.2023 and pass final orders within a period of eight weeks; disposed of without costs.

N.Seetharaman Vs the District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.26652 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 12.09.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR

¶6

W.P No.26652 of 2024

¶7

N.Seetharaman ...Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The District Collector, Chennai District, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001.

¶10

The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Sholoinganallur, Chennai - 600 119. ...Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 & 2 to issue patta to the petitioner's house property situated at Plot No.1-C & 2-C, extent of 3600 sq.ft., in its survey No.188/8 part, situated at Madurakali Nagar, Madipakkam Village, Sholinganallur Taluk, Chennai District.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Kannan

¶13

For Respondents : Mr.D.Gopal Government Advocate

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4

¶15

W.P.No.26652 of 2024

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

The petitioner herein seeks a direction to the respondents 1 & 2 to

¶18

issue patta to his house property situated at Plot No.1-C & 2-C, measuring an extent of 3600 sq.ft., in survey No.188/8 part, situated at Madurakali Nagar, Madipakkam Village, Sholinganallur Taluk, Chennai District.

¶19

According to the petitioner, the above mentioned property purchased by him under the registered documents dated 14.05.2007 and he is in possession and enjoyment of the same, by constructing house. At the time of applying patta, he was informed that the above stated property was classified as "Nanjai Anadeenam". Therefore, the petitioner made a representation dated 08.07.2023 to the first respondent seeking issuance of patta in his name, by taking into consideration his long possession of the said property. However, the said representation has not been considered till date. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶20

Mr.D.Gopal, learned Government Advocate, who takes notice

¶21

for the respondents would submit that the representation of the petitioner will

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4

¶23

W.P.No.26652 of 2024

¶24

be considered on its own merits and appropriate orders will be passed.

¶25

In view of the above submission made by the learned Government Advocate, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to issue a direction to the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 08.07.2023 and pass final orders, after issuing notice to the petitioner and other interested parties, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶26

With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶27

No costs.

¶28

12.09.2024

¶29

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order

¶30

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4

W.P.No.26652 of 2024

S. SOUNTHAR, J.

The District Collector, Chennai District, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001.

¶37

The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Sholoinganallur, Chennai - 600 119.

¶38

W.P No.26652 of 2024

¶39

12.09.2024

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

N.Seetharaman v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.Seetharaman v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Chandra Jaiswal Vs The State of TamilNadu

Mylathal Vs the District Registrar

Mylathal Vs the District Collector

D.Mohanraj Vs the District Collector

N.Selvaraju Vs Additional Director for Surey and Land Records

Vediyammal Vs the District Collector