Partly allowed

Mylathal v. the District Registrar

Madras HC11 Sept 2024WP/26431/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In W.P.No.26431 of 2024, the petitioner sought a writ of mandamus urging cancellation of a sale deed due to transactions involving non-SC/ST members. The Court directed the District Registrar to consider the representation, issue notices to parties, and pass an order within 12 weeks without adjudicating the underlying merits.

What did the court decide?

Directed the District Registrar to consider the representation, issue notices to all parties, and pass a final order on merits within twelve weeks.

Mylathal Vs the District Registrar — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.26431 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 11.09.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR

¶6

W.P No.26431 of 2024

¶7

Mylathal ...Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The District Registrar, Office of District Registrar, Thiruppur. 2. The Sub Registrar, Udumalpet, Thiruppur District. Udumalpet, Thiruppur District.

¶10

Vanitha

¶11

R.Praveen 5. R.Vijaysaravanan ...Respondents

¶12

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the representation 17.04.2023 issued by the petitioner to cancel the sale deed dated 04.06.2007 in Document No.3923 of 2007 registered before the second

¶13

respondent and pass orders on the same within a reasonable time as fixed by this Court.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Nalliyappan For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Shahjahan Special Government Pleader

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4

¶17

W.P.No.26431 of 2024

¶18

The petitioner herein seeks a direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.04.2023 seeking cancellation of the sale deed dated 04.06.2007 in Document No.3923 of 2007 registered before the second respondent.

¶19

According to the petitioner, the above said property was originally assigned in favour of the petitioner's husband . The petitioner's husband sold the property in favour of one Angammal on 12.04.1991. Later the said Angammal sold the property to one Krishnasam Naicker on 28.05.1992 and the said Krishnasam Naicker sold the said property on 04.06.2007 and based on the said sale deed in favour of the respondents 3 to 5, the patta was also issued in their names. It is accepted by the petitioner that all the purchasers namely Krishnasam Naikcker as well as respondents 3 to 5 do not belong to Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes and therefore, the sale of property in favour of a person who does not belongs to Schedule Caste community is not valid. Therefore, the petitioner made a representation before the first respondent seeking cancellation of the sale deed executed in favour of the respondents and the same has not been considered till date. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

2/4

¶22

W.P.No.26431 of 2024

¶23

Mr.M.Shahjahan, learned Special Government Pleader, who takes

¶24

notice for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that the representation of the petitioner will be considered on its own merits.

¶25

In view of the above, this Court, without expressing any opinion on

¶26

the claim made by the petitioner and also rights of the other parties, inclined to issue a direction to the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 17.04.2023 and pass final order on its own merits, after issuing necessary notice to the petitioner as well as respondents 3 to 5 and other interested parties, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶27

With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No

¶28

costs.

¶29

11.09.2024

¶30

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order av

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4

W.P.No.26431 of 2024

S. SOUNTHAR, J.

The District Registrar, Office of District Registrar, Thiruppur.

¶37

The Sub Registrar, Udumalpet, Thiruppur District. Udumalpet, Thiruppur District.

¶38

W.P No.26431 of 2024

¶39

11.09.2024

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

Mylathal v. the District Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mylathal v. the District Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Meenambal Vs The District Collector

G.Ezhilarasan Vs The secretary to Government

R.Rangarajan Vs The District Collector/Sole Arbitrator

Suresh Chandra Jaiswal Vs The State of TamilNadu

Mylathal Vs the District Collector

V.Hemalatha Vs the Secretary