produced in the typed set of papers. Though, petitioner produced death certificate and legal heir certificate of his father Easwaran, wherein he had been described as son of Swami Ayyer, in the legal heir certificate of Swami Ayyer, the name of petitioner's father was not found place. Hence, there is a serious doubt whether petitioner is a descendant of suspended hereditary trustee Swami Ayyer. This Court in Writ jurisdiction cannot decide the civil status of petitioner, whether he is descendant of suspended trustee or not, which is a disputed question of fact. The petitioner has not produced any other material to show he acted as hereditary trustee subsequent to suspension of Swami Ayyer. On the other hand materials produced by the third respondent would establish he was appointed as fit person in the year 2008 and has been acting as such. It is always open to the petitioner to establish his civil status before Civil Court and make a claim before official respondents based on Civil Court's decree declaring his status.
