Writ petition challenging pension recovery letters of Chennai Port Trust; respondents stated in counter affidavit that only an adjustment of excess gratuity under the old scheme was made with pensioners' consent, and the impugned order was beneficial to the petitioner. Petition withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.10878 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.02.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
W.P.No.10878 of 2018
and WMP.No.12820 of 2018
R.Subramani
...Petitioner
Vs.
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the Pension recovery letters to the petitioner in Sr.AO(Pension)/ALC/2017/F dated 06.01.2018 on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Doraisamy
For Respondents : Mr.Niranjan Rajagopalan for R1 & R2
1/4
W.P.No.10878 of 2018
O R D E R
This writ petition has been filed to quash the order dated 06.01.2018
of the second respondent.
2/4
W.P.No.10878 of 2018
favour of the petitioner and the central government definition of pay would be more beneficial to the petitioner.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
27.02.2024
rap Index : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No Speaking order : Yes/No
3/4
W.P.No.10878 of 2018
BATTU DEVANAND, J.
rap
To
W.P.No.10878 of 2018
27.02.2024
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.Subramani
The Chairman, Chennai Port Trust
The Financial Advisor & Chief Accounts Officer, Chennai Port Trust
Battu Devanand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
