Dismissed

A.N.M Aided Primary School, v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC26 Feb 2024WP/7551/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, a private aided school, sought to quash proceedings appointing a Noon Meal Organizer and directed the respondents to conduct a new selection involving school management participation. The court dismissed the petition, holding that the prescribed government procedure applies because the issue was already decided in prior writ appeals.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed; connected miscellaneous petition closed; no order as to costs.

A.N.M Aided Primary School, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.7551 of 2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated: 26.02.2024

¶4

Coram:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

¶6

W.P.No.7551 of 2018 and W.M.P.No.9418 of 2018

¶7

A.N.M.Aided Primary School, Pandikuppam, R.K.Pet Range, Thiruvallur District, Rep.by its Secretary, K.Anbu, S/o A.Kannappan(late)

¶8

.. Petitioner

¶9

/versus/

¶10

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government, Social Welfare & Nutritious Meal Program Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

¶11

2.The District Collector, Thiruvalur District, Thiruvallur.

¶12

3.The Block Development Officer, R.K.Pet Panchayat Union, Thiruvallur District.

¶13

4.R.Vasanthi

¶14

.. Respondents

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

1/8

Prayer:

W.P.No.7551 of 2018

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to impugned proceedings issued by the 2^nd respondent in Na.Ka.1250/Sa.Vu.Thi-1/2016, dated 21.03.2018 and to quash the same and consequently directing the respondents 1 to 3 to conduct selection to the post of Noon Meal Organizer by adopting method of selection involving participation of School Management and in compliance with other legal requirements.

¶20

For Petitioner :Ms.M.Kaviya for Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan

¶21

For Respondents :Mr.P.Muthukumar, AAG 1 to 3 Asst.by Mr.L.S.M.Hazan Fizal, AGP

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

This Writ Petition has been filed against the impugned order issued by the 2^nd respondent in Na.Ka.1250/Sa.Vu.Thi.1/2016, dated 21.03.2018 and for a consequential direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to conduct selection to the post of Noon Meal Organizer by adopting the method of selection involving the participation of School Management.

¶24

On behalf of the respondents 1 to 3, counter affidavit has been

¶25

filed.

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

2/8

¶28

W.P.No.7551 of 2018

¶29

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 and also perused the materials available on record.

¶30

The petitioner is the Private Aided Non-Minority School as per the provisions of Tamil Nadu Recognized Private School (Regulation) Act and the Rules made thereunder. The Noon Meal Centers are situated within the School Premises with appointment of Noon Meal Organizer, Cook and Assistant. The State Government of Tamil Nadu issued orders in G.O.(Ms)No.215, Chief Minister Nutritious Meal Programme and Social Welfare Department dated 09.12.1988 prescribing method of appointment by local body concerned. To appoint Noon Meal Organizer in the petitioner school, the second respondent has issued impugned proceedings dated 21.03.2018. Challenging the same, the present Writ Petition is filed.

¶31

The main ground raised in the writ petition is that Private Aided School Management, like the petitioner school, cannot be disassociated from running Noon Meal School Centre, since the space, building and other infrastructural facilities to run the Noon Meal Centre are provided by the School Management. Without evolving any scheme and without method of selection

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

3/8

¶34

W.P.No.7551 of 2018

¶35

and appointment to the post of Noon Meal Organiser, the respondents now proceeded to take steps to fill up the post of Noon Meal Organiser as per the terms of Government Orders issued in G.O.Ms.No.163, Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme (SW2) Department, dated 18.08.2010 and G.O.Ms.No.4, Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme (SW2) Department, dated 06.01.2011, which is ex-facie illegal, arbitrary and against the law and sought to allow the writ petition.

¶36

The learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 contends that the Government after careful examination of the various orders have been issued earlier in connection with the appointment of Noon Meal Organiser, Cook and Assistant and after making a review, has decided, which prescribed certain criteria for educational qualification, age and distance criteria for the direct recruitment of Noon Meal Organiser, Cook and Assistant. Accordingly, issued G.O.Ms.No.163, Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme (SW2) Department, dated 18.08.2010. Certain amendments were made to G.O.Ms.No.163 dated 18.08.2010, by virtue of G.O.Ms.No.4 Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme (SW2) Department, dated 06.01.2011. In G.O.Ms.No.4, Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme (SW2) Department, dated 06.01.2011, the procedure is prescribed for

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

4/8

¶39

W.P.No.7551 of 2018

¶40

appointment of Noon Meal Organiser in Government Aided Non-Minority School, which is extracted hereunder:-

¶41

“ Government Aided Non-Minority School Nutritious Meal Centres:-

¶42

For the appointment of the post of Nutritious Meal Center Employees in the Government Aided Non Minority School Centres should follow the procedure mentioned in the G.O.ms.No.163, Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme, dated 18.08.2010 and Government order relating to Community Roaster vide G.O.Ms.No.142, Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme, dated 06.07.2010. That is, the appointment of non-minorities school Nutritious Meal Programme employees (Organizer, Cook (and) Assistant) should be done in the same manner as the appointment of nutrition workers of Government/Local Body School Center (Panchayat Union/Municipality/Corporation).”

¶43

As per the procedure, all the Non-Minority School Centers should

¶44

follow the procedures provided in G.O.(Ms) No.163, Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme Department, dated 18.08.2010 and with regard to communal roaster, the procedure prescribed in G.O.Ms.No.142, Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme Department, dated 06.07.2010 has to be followed. The learned Additional Advocate General further stated that G.O.Ms.No.163, Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme Department, dated 18.08.2010 and G.O.Ms.No. 142, Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme Department, dated 06.07.2010 are upheld by this Court in W.A.(MD)Nos.792 of 2012 etc. batch by an order dated 22.03.2017.

¶45

In view of the fact that the procedure prescribed under G.O.Ms.No.

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

5/8

¶48

W.P.No.7551 of 2018

¶49

163, Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme Department, dated 18.08.2010 and G.O.Ms.No.142, Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme Department, dated 06.07.2010 are upheld by this Court, in the considered view of this Court, the petitioner is not entitled for the relief sought for in the present Writ Petition, as the issue has already been decided by this Court in the said Writ Appeals.

¶50

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed.

¶51

Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶52

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶53

26.02.2024

¶54

Index:yes/no Speaking order/non speaking order Neutral Citation:yes/no ari

¶55

To:

¶56

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶57

6/8

¶58

W.P.No.7551 of 2018

¶59

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government, Social Welfare & Nutritious Meal Program Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

¶60

2.The District Collector, Thiruvalur District, Thiruvallur.

¶61

3.The Block Development Officer, R.K.Pet Panchayat Union, Thiruvallur District.

¶62

BATTU DEVANAND,J.

¶63

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

7/8

W.P.No.7551 of 2018

ari

W.P.No.7551 of 2018 and W.M.P.No.9418 of 2018

¶68

26.02.2024

¶69

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶70

8/8

A.N.M Aided Primary School, v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.N.M Aided Primary School, v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Surendhiran Vs Managing Director

J.Shanthi Vs The Director of Elementary

M.Manoharan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

M.Ameerkhan Vs The District Forest Officer

V.Jayapraba, Vs The District Collector

C.Thangaduari, Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu