Rajmohan v. The President
Case brief
What is this about?
The court allowed a prayer to dispense with the filing of the original supporting order, noting that its authenticity was uncontested, while observing that adequate articulation in support affidavits is imperative for future cases.
What did the court decide?
Prayer to dispense with filing of original Proc.No. NIL dated 06.08.2021 acceded to.
What the court decided
W.M.P.No.19440 of 2021 in W.P.No.18211 of 2021
W.M.P.No.19440 of 2021 in W.P.No.18211 of 2021
M.SUNDAR.J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J.,
(Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,)
Captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petition' ['WMP' for the sake of
brevity] has been filed with a prayer to dispense with the filing of original 'Proc.No. NIL dated 06.08.2021 on the file of 1st respondent' [hereinafter 'impugned order' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity].
- The reasons to support the dispense with prayer have not
been articulated in the support affidavit. However, in the hearing, it is submitted that a copy of the impugned order was obtained from similarly placed persons.
- Taking into account the fact that the authenticity of the
1/3
Coram
M.SUNDAR
K.RAJASEKAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court