Writ petition sought removal of encroachment on Government poramboke land by private respondents. With the petitioner absent and not pursuing the matter despite an opportunity being given for dismissal, the High Court dismissed both the writ petition and the connected miscellaneous petition for default, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.9485 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.11.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR
W.P.No.9485 of 2021 and
W.M.P.No.10082 of 2021
in
W.P.No.9485 of 2021
P.Sivasamy S/o.Palanimuthu ... Petitioner
Vs.
Page Nos.1/6
W.P.No.9485 of 2021
Prayer :
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st to 4th respondent to pass orders on the representation dated 11.11.2019 by removing illegal encroachment of the 5th to 9th respondent from the Government Poramboke (Tharisu) land in S.Nos.25/6 and 8 at Pinnanur Village, Gangavalli Taluk now Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District.
For Petitioner : No representation For Respondents : Mr.T.K.Saravanan Government Advocate for R1 to R4 Mr.L.Mouli, for R5 to R9 *****
Page Nos.2/6
W.P.No.9485 of 2021
O R D E R
[Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J. ,]
Read this in conjunction with and in continuation of earlier proceedings made in the previous listing on 13.11.2024 which reads as
follows:
'W.P.No.9485 of 2021 and W.M.P.No.10082 of 2021
in
W.P.No.9485 of 2021
M.SUNDAR, J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J.,
[Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR. J.,]
There is no representation for writ petitioner either in the physical Court or on 'Videoconferencing' {'VC'} platform. To be noted, this is a hybrid hearing, which is a daily / regular / routine feature in this Court.
2. However, R1 to R4 are represented by Mr.V.Ravi, learned Special Government Pleader and R5 to R9 are represented by Mr.L.Mouli, learned counsel.
3. Mr.V.Ravi, learned Special Government Pleader and Mr.L.Mouli, learned counsel for R5 to R9 are before us in physical Court.
4. With the intention of giving an opportunity to writ petitioner and learned counsel for writ petitioner, list this matter tomorrow (14.11.2024) under the cause list caption 'FOR DISMISSAL'.'
Page Nos.3/6
W.P.No.9485 of 2021
brevity} is listed under the cause list caption 'FOR DISMISSAL'. The position is no different today i.e., there is no representation for the writ petitioner.
costs.
Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order
mk
Page Nos.4/6
W.P.No.9485 of 2021
To
Page Nos.5/6
W.P.No.9485 of 2021
M.SUNDAR, J.,
and K.RAJASEKAR, J.,
mk
W.P.No.9485 of 2021
15.11.2024
Page Nos.6/6
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Sivasamy S/o.Palanimuthu
The District Collector, Salem District
The District Revenue Officer, Salem District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Attur Division, Salem District
The Tahsildar, Thalavasal Taluk, Salem District
P.Selvaraj S/o.Poomalai
M.Sundar
K.Rajasekar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
