M/S. Momentous Photography v. State Tax Officer / Adjudication - II
Case brief
What is this about?
The court disposed of the writ appeal as infructuous upon counsel's submission, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WA No.988 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.11.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
WA No.988 of 2023 and CMP No.9883 of 2023
M/s.Momentous Photography
rep. By its Proprietor E.G.Shanthasheelan
: Appellant
versus
Prayer: Writ appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order of learned Single Judge dated 18.04.2023 in WMP No.11745 of 2023 in WP No.11848 of 2023.
For Appellant : Mr.B.Raveendran For Respondents : Mr.C.Harsha Raj, Additional Government Pleader (Taxes)
Page 1 of 4
WA No.988 of 2023
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Counsel says that the appeal has become infructuous.
Consequently, the interim application also stands disposed of.
(K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ.) (SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.)
05.11.2024
Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No tar
Page 2 of 4
WA No.988 of 2023
To
Page 3 of 4
WA No.988 of 2023
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
(tar)
WA No.988 of 2023
05.11.2024
Page 4 of 4
M/s.Momentous Photography
State Tax Officer/Adjudication II, Salem Intelligence Division, Salem
The Superintendent, Arisipalayam
K.R.Shriram
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court