Appeal against a judgment and decree in an Original Petition before the Madras High Court. After brief hearing, counsel sought leave to withdraw; the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
O.S.A. No.290 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.11.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
O.S.A. No.290 of 2019 and CMP No.23325 of 2019
Anurag Sharan
: Appellant
versus
1.M/s.J.M.Financial Service Pvt. Ltd 7th Floor, Cnergy Appasaheb, Marathe Marg, Prabha Devi, Mumbai 400025 2.S.Subramanian, Sole Arbitrator, (Civil Judge Senior Division Rtd.,) National Stock Exchange of India Ltd., Regional Arbitration Centre, Old No.7, New No.1, Nawab Garden, Murugappa Road, Kotturpuram, Chennai 600085 (Amended as per order dated 23.01.2019 in A.No.392/2019) : Respondents
Prayer: Appeal filed against the judgment and decree dated 11.06.2019 in
Page 1 of 3
O.S.A. No.290 of 2019
OP No.468 of 2012 on the file of this Court.
For Appellant : Mr.Gowtham Kumar For Respondent No.1 : Ms.Vinithra Srinivasan for M/s.NVS & Associates
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
After the appeal was heard for some time, counsel sought leave to withdraw the appeal.
costs. Consequently, connected interim application stands closed.
(K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ.) (SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.)
04.11.2024
Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No tar
Page 2 of 3
O.S.A. No.290 of 2019
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
(tar)
O.S.A. No.290 of 2019
04.11.2024
Page 3 of 3
Anurag Sharan
M/s.J.M.Financial Service Pvt. Ltd
S.Subramanian
K.R.Shriram
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
