Petitioner sought removal of encroachments allegedly not effected despite the District Collector's 2011 direction; counsel opted to withdraw and pursue fresh proceedings before the appropriate forum, and the sub-application was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sub Application No.309 of 2024 in Cont.P.No.368 of 2011
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
and SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J.
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
According to petitioner, this sub-application has become necessary in view of the Block Development Officer, Kattankulathur, with the assistance of Tahsildar not removing the encroachments, though directed by the District Collector vide order dated 21.06.2011.
Sub-Application is, therefore, closed.
(K.R.SHRIRAM., CJ.) (SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.) 05.11.2024
sra
K.R.Shriram
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
