Allowed

Punithavathy v. the Inspector General of Registration

Madras HC5 Jun 2024WA/1571/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Writ Appeal allowed the petitioner's petition against the refusal to register a Settlement Deed. The Court directed the Sub Registrar to register the document upon production of a certified copy of the Parent Title Deed.

What did the court decide?

Impugned rejection order and Single Judge's order set aside; direction to Sub Registrar to register the document upon production of certified copy of Parent Title Deed.

Punithavathy Vs the Inspector General of Registration — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.A.No.1571 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 05.06.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL

¶8

Writ Appeal No.1571 of 2024

Punithavathy

..Appellant

Vs.

The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Mullima Nagar, Mandavelipakkam, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai 600 028.

¶13

The Deputy Inspector General of Registration – Coimbatore Zone, 6/1 GRD Road, Opp. Airforce Admin College, Redfields, Puliakulam, Coimbatore – 641 018.

¶14

The District Registrar, Collector office compound, Gopalapuram, Coimbatore – 641 018.

¶15

The Sub Registrar – Erode Joint 1, Erode Joint I Sub Registrar Office, Erode. .. Respondents

¶16

Prayer: Writ Appeals filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order passed by this Court dated 02.11.2023 passed in W.P. No.31013 of 2023.

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

1/5

¶19

W.A.No.1571 of 2024

¶20

For Appellant : Mr.R.Narayanan

¶21

For Respondents : Mr.B.Vijay,

¶22

Additional Government Pleader

¶23

J U D G M E N T

¶24

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)

¶25

The Joint-II Sub Registrar, Erode has refused to register the document viz. a Settlement Deed executed by the petitioner in favour of her daughter on the ground that the original parent document has not been produced. The said order has been upheld by the learned Single Judge.

¶26

2. The very same issue was dealt with in detail by this Court in

¶27

The Federal Bank Ltd. vs. The Sub Registrar.

¶28

3. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant that

¶29

the original of the document is retained by her husband and she cannot be expected to produce the same as the relationship is strained. In the circumstances, the right of the appellant to deal with the property which is

¶30

2/5

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.A.No.1571 of 2024

¶33

protected under Article 300-A of the constitution, cannot be affected by a rule which has been introduced with the view to prevent bogus registrations. The Registering Authority can verify the ownership from the certified copy of the original which is also issued by the very same department. Hence we find that the Registering Authority should be directed to register the document if the appellant produces the certified copy of the parent document.

¶34

4. In view of the above, the Writ Appeal is allowed, the order of the learned Single as well as the impugned rejection order are set aside. There will be a direction to the concerned Sub Registrar viz. the fourth respondent to register the document upon production of a certified copy of the Parent Title Deed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶35

(R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.) (R.SAKTHIVEL, J.) 05.06.2024

¶36

Index: No Internet: Yes Speaking order Neutral Citation: No jv

¶37

3/5

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

W.A.No.1571 of 2024

¶40

¶41

The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Mullima Nagar, Mandavelipakkam, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai 600 028.

¶42

The Deputy Inspector General of Registration – Coimbatore Zone, 6/1 GRD Road, Opp. Airforce Admin College, Redfields, Puliakulam, Coimbatore – 641 018.

¶43

The District Registrar, Collector office compound, Gopalapuram, Coimbatore – 641 018.

¶44

The Sub Registrar – Erode Joint 1, Erode Joint I Sub Registrar Office, Erode.

¶45

4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

W.A.No.1571 of 2024

¶47

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

¶48

and R.SAKTHIVEL, J.

¶49

(jv)

¶50

Writ Appeal No.1571 of 2024

¶51

05.06.2024

¶52

5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Punithavathy v. the Inspector General of Registration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Punithavathy v. the Inspector General of Registration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Venkatesan Vs N.Karthikeyan

N.Thilagavathy Vs G.Venkatesan

G.Lalitha Vs G.Ponnurangam (Died)

S.Rajendran Vs Prakasam

Lakshmi @ Shahithabegam (Died) 1) Nasuni Vs L.S.Shafir Ahmed

Nasuni Vs L.S.Syed Yejas Ahamed