Nasuni Vs L.S.Syed Yejas Ahamed

¶1

C.M.P.Nos. 7275, 7277 & 7278 of 2024 in

¶2

A.S.No.64 of 2017

¶3

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and

¶4

R.SAKTHIVEL, J.

¶5

These applications have been filed seeking condonation of delay of 568 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused by the death of the 16th respondent in C.M.P.No.21891 of 2023, to set aside the abatement and to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased 16th respondent and rank them as respondents 17 to 20 in A.S.No.64 of 2017.

¶6

Mr.Abdul Razak, learned counsel has entered appearance for the proposed parties.

¶7

3.Accepting the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petitions, these petitions are allowed, the delay of 568 days in filing the petitions to set aside the abatement is condoned, the abatement caused by the death of the deceased 16th respondent in C.M.P.No.21891 of 2023 is set aside and the respondents 15 to 18 are brought on record as legal representatives of the 16th respondent and ranked as respondents 17 to 20 in the appeal.

¶8

4.Registry is directed to carry out the amendment.

¶9

(R.S.M., J.) (R.S.V., J.) 05.06.2024

¶10

kkn

¶11

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶12

1/2

¶13

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and R.SAKTHIVEL, J.

¶14

KKN

¶15

C.M.P.Nos. 7275, 7277 & 7278 of 2024 in A.S.No.64 of 2017

¶16

05.06.2024

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

2/2

Nasuni v. L.S.Syed Yejas Ahamed

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nasuni v. L.S.Syed Yejas Ahamed

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Venkatesan Vs N.Karthikeyan

N.Thilagavathy Vs G.Venkatesan

G.Lalitha Vs G.Ponnurangam (Died)

Punithavathy Vs the Inspector General of Registration

S.Rajendran Vs Prakasam

Lakshmi @ Shahithabegam (Died) 1) Nasuni Vs L.S.Shafir Ahmed