Applications filed to mark documents as secondary evidence were allowed subject to proof, admission, and relevancy. Respondents permitted to file admission/denial affidavits.
Permission granted to mark documents as secondary evidence and file additional documents subject to admission, proof, and relevancy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(TM)A No.73 of 2024 etc
(TM) A. Nos.73 and 74 of 2024 in (T)OP(TM) No.287 of 2023 and (TM) A. Nos.75 and 76 of 2024 in (T)OP(TM) No.256 of 2023 and (TM) A. Nos.77 and 78 of 2024 in (T)OP(TM) No.451 of 2023
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
Application Nos.73, 75 and 77 of 2024 have been filed seeking permission of this Court to mark the documents listed out in the schedule to the judges summons as secondary evidence.
1/3
(TM)A No.73 of 2024 etc
documents can be received and marked as exhibits, subject to its admission, proof and relevancy. He would further submit that the
respondents may be permitted to file an affidavit of admission/denial of documents in respect of the documents sought to be received. The learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner has not raised any serious objection for the same.
Post the matter for filing affidavit of admission/denial of documents on 19.11.2024.
05.11.2024
rkm
2/3
(TM)A No.73 of 2024 etc
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
rkm
(TM) A. Nos.73 and 74 of 2024 in (T)OP(TM) No.287 of 2023 and (TM) A. Nos.75 and 76 of 2024 in (T)OP(TM) No.256 of 2023 and (TM) A. Nos.77 and 78 of 2024 in (T)OP(TM) No.451 of 2023
05.11.2024
3/3
ABDUL QUDDHOSE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
