Interlocutory order allowing two defendants' applications in a commercial suit: one for filing additional documents, unopposed, and another to mark documents as secondary evidence over the plaintiff's objection, subject to admission, proof and relevancy, with liberty to cross-examine on their veracity.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
O.A.Nos.2143 and 2754 of 2024
Application Nos.2143 and 2754 of 2024 in C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.16 of 2021
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
Application No.2143 of 2024 has been filed by the defendants seeking permission of this Court to file additional documents. The learned counsel for the respondent/plaintiff has not raised any serious objection for allowing this application.
seeking permission of this Court to file the documents listed out in the schedule to the judges summons by way of secondary evidence. The applicants/defendants have given reasons for not filing the original of those documents at the time of filing of the suit.
1/3
O.A.Nos.2143 and 2754 of 2024
Post the matter for case management hearing and for framing issues on 25.11.2024.
04.11.2024
rkm
2/3
O.A.Nos.2143 and 2754 of 2024
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. rkm
Application Nos.2143 and 2754 of 2024 in C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.16 of 2021
04.11.2024
3/3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the defendants may file additional documents in the suit.
Whether the defendants may mark scheduled documents by way of secondary evidence despite the plaintiff's objection.
Abdul Quddhose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
