Subramanian v. Oorudaiyan
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal dismissed as abated. The sole appellant died on 10.08.2022, and no steps were taken within the limitation period stipulated for filing after death.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed as abated. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
SA.(MD)No.506 of 2006
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 26.11.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
SA.(MD)No.506 of 2006 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2006 Subramanian ... Appellant Vs.
1.Oorudaiyan 2.Periyasami 3.Easwari ... Respondents
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 Cr.P.C., against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.183 of 2003 dated 26.12.2005 on the file of the First Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirapalli, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.151 of 1995 dated 10.06.2002 on the file of the District Munsif, Musiri.
For Appellant : Mr.T.M.Hariharan For Respondent : No appearance
JUDGMENT
This second appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.183 of 2003 dated 26.12.2005 on the file of the First Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirapalli, confirming the judgment
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Subramanian
- respondent
Oorudaiyan
- respondent
Periyasami
- respondent
Easwari
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court