K.Kamaraj v. K.Govindaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal against concurrent decrees in a title suit. Sole appellant died and no steps were taken to bring his legal representatives on record despite adjournment, so the appeal was dismissed as abated.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 02.04.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
S.A(MD)NO.65 OF 2014
K.Kamaraj :Appellant/Appellant/Plaintiff
.vs.
K.Govindaraj :Respondent/Respondent/Defendant
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.9 of 2012, dated 11.09.2013, on the file of Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram, confirming the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.30 of 2007, dated 08.02.2012, on the file of Sub-Court, Ramanathapuram.
For Appellant :Mr.D.Sasikumar
For Respondent :Mr.K.Mahendran
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.Kamaraj
- respondent
K.Govindaraj
Coram
S.Sounthar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court