2.According to the appellants/plaintiffs, their father Mari Pandi Nadar purchased the suit item No.1 under a sale deed, dated 19.09.1959. From the date of purchase, the appellants and their predecessor in interest Mari Pandi Nadar have been in possession and enjoyment of the second schedule ‘ABCD’ compound wall continuously without any interruption and hence, they acquired adverse title over the same. It was claimed by the appellants that the respondents without having any manner of right, had put up construction over the second schedule compound wall in and around 1988. Therefore, the appellants were constrained to file the suit for declaration of their adverse title over the suit second schedule property with the consequential relief of permanent injunction and mandatory injunction. The appellants also claim adverse title over the suit third schedule property shown as ‘BCDE’ on the west of the second schedule compound wall. The suit was also laid for the relief of declaration of appellants adverse title over the suit third schedule property and for consequential relief of mandatory injunction and for permanent injunction.
