Kazhuvayammal v. v.Meenatchiammal
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed for default as appellants' counsel filed a memo reporting no instruction and no one appeared for the appellants when the appeal was listed for dismissal.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD).No.25 of 2008
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 03.04.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
S.A.(MD).No.25 of 2008
1.Kazhuvayammal 2.S.Tharmar 3.S.Pandian 4.Rajangam 5.Muthumani ... Appellants
Vs.
1.V.meenatchiammal 2.V.Chinnathambi 3.V.Mokkapandi 4.V.Jeyapal 5.D.Deivajothi 6.D.Santhi 7.Minor Rajkumar 8.Minor Ramkumar (Minor respondents 7 and 8 are represented by their mother the 6th respondent herein) 9.Peyathever 10.M.Mayandi Thevar ... Respondents
PRAYER: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 28.02.2006 passed in A.S.No.54 of 2002 on the file of Subordinate Court, Periyakulam, as reversing the judgment and decree dated 23.11.2001 passed in O.S.No.309 of 1989 on the file of District Munsif Court, Periyakulam.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kazhuvayammal
- appellant
S.Tharmar
- appellant
S.Pandian
- appellant
Rajangam
- appellant
Muthumani
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court