Jayasankar v. Chenrayan
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal against concurrent decrees in a suit was dismissed for non-prosecution, as there was no representation for the appellants despite several adjournments. Connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.
What the court decided
S.A.No.951 of 2019 and CMP Nos19683 and 20202 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
S.A.No.951 of 2019 and C.M.P Nos.19683 and 20202 of 2019
- Jayasankar
- Natarajan 3. Manimegalai ... Appellants
..Vs..
Chenrayan
... Respondent
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 31.01.2019 in A.S.No.19 of 2013 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Tirupattur, Vellore District, upholding the decree and judgment dated 21.12.2011 in O.S.No.341 of 2005 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tirupattur, Vellore District.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jayasankar
- appellant
Natarajan
- appellant
Manimegalai
- respondent
Chenrayan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court