This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.No.44 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
S.A.No.44 of 2022
Ponnusamy Gounder ... Appellant ..Vs..
... Respondent
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 07.01.2021 in A.S.No.5 of 2019 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Palladam, upholding the decree and judgment dated 21.07.2007 in O.S.No.193 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Palladam.
For Appellant : No appearance
1/3
S.A.No.44 of 2022
R. HEMALATHA, J.
bga
JUDGMENT
A perusal of the records shows that the present appeal has not
yet been admitted and regular adjournments were taken by the appellant. When the matter is taken up for hearing today,which is listed under the caption "adjourned admission", there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
2. In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed for
non prosecution. No costs.
14.11.2024
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No bga
To
S.A.No.44 of 2022
2/3
S.A.No.44 of 2022
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ponnusamy Gounder
S. Komarasamy Gounder
K. Subbathal
K. Palanisamy
R. Hemalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
