This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.No.821 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 13.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
S.A.No.821 of 2022
S. Vijayaraghavan ... Appellant ..Vs..
Kousalya (deceased) 1. K. Chandrasekaran
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 13.11.2018 in A.S.No.147 of 2012 on the file of the V Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, reversing the decree and judgment dated 29.11.2011 in O.S.No.6142 of 2007 on the file of the VIII Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance
1/4
S.A.No.821 of 2022
JUDGMENT
On 19.10.2024, this Court passed the following orders:
"It is reported that the counsel on record in S.A.No.821/2022 is no more practising Advocate. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant reports that he will get instruction and file vakalat and also file necessary steps for impleading the LRs of the deceased Respondent No.2, namely C. Sivaji Anand.
List the matter after two weeks for taking steps for filing change of vakalat."
13.11.2024
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No bga
2/4
S.A.No.821 of 2022
To
3/4
S.A.No.821 of 2022
R. HEMALATHA, J.
bga
S.A.No.821 of 2022
13.11.2024
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal should be disposed of for non-prosecution?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Vijayaraghavan
Kousalya (deceased)
K. Chandrasekaran
C. Sivaji Anand
Balaji Anand
Arulmighu Theertha Baleeswarar Temple
R. Hemalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
