Second appeal against concurrent decrees in a property suit; appellant died during pendency and counsel made an endorsement to that effect. The Madras High Court dismissed the appeal as abated, with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.No.899 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.01.2024
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
S.A.No.899 of 2013
Mallika Begum
... Appellant
vs.
1.E.Dayalan 2.Pushpa
3.Ponraj
4.The Commissioner, Commissioner of Chennai, Chennai - 600 034 … Respondents
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC to set aside the Decree and Judgment dated 26.08.2010 made in A.S.No.614 of 2007 on the file of the learned Additional District and Fast Track Court No.II, Chennai - 600 001 confirming the Decree and Judgment dated 18.07.2007 in O.S.No.5715 of 2003 on the file of the learned 1st Assistant Judge, City Civil Court at Chennai.
1/6
S.A.No.899 of 2013
For Appellant : Mrs.M.Shanthi For Respondent 4 : No appearance
ORDER
Learned counsel for the Appellant submitted that the Appellant
died and also made an endorsement in the court bundle. Accordingly, this
second appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.
23.01.2024
nl
Index : Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No
2/6
S.A.No.899 of 2013
To
3/6
S.A.No.899 of 2013
4/6
S.A.No.899 of 2013
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
nl
S.A.No.899 of 2013
5/6
S.A.No.899 of 2013
23.01.2024
6/6
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mallika Begum
E.Dayalan
Pushpa
Ponraj
The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai
V.Lakshminarayanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
