Anandhan v. Karuppannan
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was dismissed as it abated because all parties had died several years ago without taking steps. No costs were awarded.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.01.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
S.A.No.555 of 2013 & MP.No.1 of 2013
Anandhan
rep. by Power Agent Ramasamy
... Appellant
Vs.
1.Karuppannan
2.Nallammal
rep. by Power Agent Ko.Chi.Veerappan ...respondents Prayer :- This Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and decree dated 20.12.2012 made in A.S.No.57 of 2011 on the file of the Sub Court, Namakkal confirming the judgment and decree dated 05.09.2011 passed in O.S.No.619 of 2004 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Namakkal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Anandhan
- respondent
1. Karuppannan
- respondent
2. Nallammal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court