Gopalakrishnan v. S. Ganesan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge dismissed an appeal by abatement, holding that the sole appellant had died in 2022 and no legal heirs initiated proceedings to continue the suit.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.01.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
S.A.No.1308 of 2013 MP.No.1 of 2013
Gopalakrishnan ... Appellant
Vs. S.Ganesan .......respondent
Prayer :- This Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and decree dated 07.04.2011 made in A.S.No.131 of 2010 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Maiyaladuthurai reversing the judgment and decree dated 15.09.2010 passed in O.S.No.234 of 2009 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Maiyaladuthurai.
For Appellant : Ms.Monisha for Mr.Marudhachalamurthy For Respondent : No appearance
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Gopalakrishnan
- respondent
S. Ganesan
Coram
V. Lakshminarayanan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court