G.Nagarathinam v. Ponnusamy
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed as having abated because the sole appellant died and no legal heirs were impleaded by the time of the hearing.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal is dismissed as abated.
What the court decided
S.A.No.823 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.12.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
S.A. No.823 of 2017
G.Nagarathinam ... Appellant ..Vs.. Ponnusamy ... Respondent
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 20.02.2014 in A.S.No.16 of 2013 on the file of the Sub Court, Rasipuram, upholding the decree and judgment dated 24.07.2012 in O.S.No.131 of 2010 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Rasipuram.
For Appellant : Mr.G.Pugazhenthi For Respondent : Mr.N.Suresh
1/2
S.A.No.823 of 2017
Parties & counsel
- appellant
G.Nagarathinam
- respondent
Ponnusamy
Coram
R. Hemalatha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court