Pankajakshan v. Mrs.B.Sujitha
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant's counsel was absent and not ready to argue despite prior hearings; no costs awarded and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
What did the court decide?
None granted; appeal dismissed for non-prosecution without costs.
What the court decided
S.A.No.65 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.12.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
S.A. No.65 of 2017 and C.M.P.No.1092 of 2017
Pankajakshan ... Appellant ..Vs..
- B.Sujitha
- Prabhavathy ... Respondents
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the decree and judgment, dated 24.06.2013 in A.S.No.6/2013 on the file of the Principal District Court, Coimbatore, confirming the decree and judgment dated 12.10.2012 in O.S.No.254/2007 on the file of the II Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore.
JUDGMENT
The matter is posted under the caption 'for dismissal' today
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Pankajakshan
- respondent
B.Sujitha
- respondent
Prabhavathy
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court