Durisamy v. v.Krishnasamy(died)
Case brief
What is this about?
In this second appeal, the High Court of Judicature at Madras allowed the appeal and restored the trial court’s decree, holding that Grama natham lands vest with the original occupant regardless of government classification.
What did the court decide?
The judgment and decree of the Court of the Subordinate Judge in A.S.No.15 of 2009 dated 28.06.2010 setting aside the District Munsif's decree are set aside; the judgment of the District Munsif in O.S
What the court decided
S.A.No.702 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.03.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
S.A.No.702 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013
- Duraisamy
2.Krishnasamy Gounder (died)
3.Palanisamy
4.Subramani @ Duraisamy
5.Kuppayal
6.Palanisamy Gounder (died)
(Memo recorded, A6 died A7 already on record as the legal heir of the deceased A6)
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellate court acted correctly in reversing the trial court’s judgment absent legally acceptable evidence.
Whether Grama natham lands vest with the Government or the original occupant.
Whether the appellate court was correct in reversing the judgment on the ground that appellants failed to prove possession.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Duraisamy and 16 others
- respondent
V.Krishnasamy and The Government of Tamil Nadu and 4 others
Coram
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court