The Commissioner v. P.S.Arumugam
Case brief
What is this about?
This miscellaneous petition allowed the impleadment of respondents 2 to 6 as subsequent purchasers of the property deemed necessary parties.
What did the court decide?
Allow the petition to implead respondents 2 to 6 as subsequent purchasers of the property.
What the court decided
C.M.P.No.3693 of 2024 in S.A.No.390 of 2013
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN ,J.
The respondents 2 to 6 are the subsequent purchasers of the property. They are necessary parties to the proceeding. Hence, this civil miscellaneous petition is allowed. They are impleaded.
- Mr.M.Jothi Kumar, the learned counsel shall serve the entire typed set of papers to the parties, who are newly impleaded in the appeal.
15.03.2024
dpa
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether subsequent purchasers of the property are necessary parties to the proceeding and should be impleaded.
Parties & counsel
- other
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
- respondent
respondents 2 to 6
Coram
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court