M.Sree Ramulu v. Krishnan(Deceased), 1. K.Ganambal
Case brief
What is this about?
2921 of 2024 in S.A.No.164 of 2013…
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.Nos.2918, 2920 & 2921 of 2024 in S.A.No.164 of 2013
C.M.P.Nos.2918, 2920 & 2921 of 2024 in S.A.No.164 of 2013
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN ,J.
These petitions have been filed (i) to condone the delay of 1791 days in filing the petition (ii) to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of sole respondent and (iii) to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased sole respondent.
- Mr.R.Rajaramani, the learned counsel appear for Mr.V.R.Annagandhi for the respondents. The respondents were served and service is completed.
- I am satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the above petitions. Hence, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are ordered.
- Office is directed to carry out the necessary amendment and post the appeal on 25.03.2024 for final disposal.
18.03.2024
dpa
1/2
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay of 1791 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Petitions.
Coram
V LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court