Bhuvaneswari v. a. Sadhashivam 69 Years
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed for default due to the absence of the appellants' counsel on multiple hearing dates. The court disposed of the matter without adjudicating on merits.
Second appeal dismissed for default due to the absence of the appellants' counsel on multiple hearing dates. The court disposed of the matter without adjudicating on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.No.566 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.03.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
S.A.No.566 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
9.Vijayalakshmi ... Appellants/Appellants/ Defendants 6 to 14
Vs.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ___________
Page No 1 of 4
S.A.No.566 of 2014
15.Sellakumarasamy 16.Dharmaraj 17.Vijayakumar 18.C.Krishnamoorthi 19.Karuppanna gunder (deceased) (Appellants 1, 2, 3 and R20 are recorded as Lrs of the deceased R19 vide order of this Court dated 28.04.2014)
20.Shanmugasundaram ...Respondents/Respondents 1 to 20 /Plaintiffs and Defendants 1 to 5
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 28.09.2012 made in A.S.No.61 of 2011 on the file of the Court of First Additional Subordinate Judge, Erode, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 21.03.2011 in O.S.No.6 of 2008 on the file of the Court of District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kodumudi.
For Appellants : No Appearance
For Respondents : For RR1, 3, 4 to 7, 9, 11, 12 to 15 – Notice Served – NA For RR16 to 18 and 20 – NA For RR2, 8 and 10 – Not ready in notice For R19 – Died
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants has been absent on 07.03.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ___________
Page No 2 of 4
S.A.No.566 of 2014
and 08.03.2024. Even today, when the matter was called, he is not present. Being left with no other option, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default.
No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
11.03.2024
Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No Speaking order / Non-speaking order nl
To 1.The First Additional Subordinate Judge Erode.
2.The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Kodumudi.
3.The Section Officer V.R.Section, High Court of Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ___________
__________ Page No 3 of 4_
S.A.No.566 of 2014
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
nl
S.A.No.566 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
and
11.03.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ___________
__________ Page No 4 of 4_
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhuvaneswari
A.Sadashivam
V.Lakshminarayanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court