The appeal was dismissed as it abated due to the death of the appellant and the first respondent, with no steps taken to substitute parties despite opportunities.
The appeal having abated, the Second Appeal is dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Second Appeal No.1318 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.03.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Second Appeal No.1318 of 2013
Ranganayaki Ammal …. Appellant
-Vs-
1.T.R.Subramanian 2.K.Boopathy …. Respondents
Prayer : Second Appeal under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 03.09.2013 made in A.S.No.69 of 2012 on the file of the learned I Additional Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore reversing the judgment and decree dated 12.07.2012 made in O.S.No.324 of 2008 on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif, Cuddalore.
For Appellant : Ms.J.Deepika for Mr.D.Ravichander For Respondents : Ms.Nilofer for Ms.R.Meenal
J U D G M E N T
Ms.J.Deepika for Mr.D.Ravichander, learned counsel for the appellant and
Ms.Nilofer for Ms.R.Meenal, learned counsel for the respondents, would agree that the appellant and the first respondent are no more and steps have not been taken despite the opportunities granted by this Court.
1 / 2
Second Appeal No.1318 of 2013
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
KST
11.03.2024
Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No Speaking Order / Non-speaking order KST To 1.The I Additional Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore. 2.The Additional District Munsif, Cuddalore.
S.A.No.1318 of 2013
2 / 2
Ranganayaki Ammal
T.R.Subramanian
K.Boopathy
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
