This short order allows the impleading petition of a subsequent purchaser, holding that as a lis pendens purchaser, the petitioner is an interested person to the proceedings under the principles in Thomson Press.
Implead the petitioner as 16th respondent in S.A.No.612 of 2013
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.15420 of 2022 in S.A.No.612 of 2013
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
The petitioner is the subsequent purchaser of the suit schedule mentioned property.
08.03.2024
nl
Note: Office is directed to implead the petitioner as 16th respondent in S.A.No.612 of 2013
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a subsequent purchaser of the property as lis pendens is an interested person for impleading in the proceedings
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Thomson Press (India) Ltd. vs. Nanak Builders and Investors (P) Ltd.Relied on¶4
Thomson Press (India) Ltd., vs. Nanak Builders and Investors (P) Ltd., (2013) 5 SCC 397 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioner
Respondent
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Parties & counsel
