A.K.Rajendran v. Dr.P.Elangovan
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed a second appeal by abatement because the respondent died before the appeal limits expired, with liberty to revive once legal representatives are traced.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed as abated with liberty to revive upon tracing legal representatives.
What the court decided
S.A. No.491 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated :18.03.2024
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
S.A. No.491 of 2018
and CMP No.13301 of 2018
1.A.K.Rajendran 2.A.S.M.Kannan 3.S.Nagaraj 4.Logaraj 5.Murugesan 6.Jabarulla 7.Sasikumar 8.Devados 9.Selvambal 10.Selvaraj 11.Subramanian 12.Velusamy 13.Elangovan 14.Natarajan 15.Selvaraj 16.Chinnappa .... Appellants
Versus Dr.P.Elangovan ... Respondent
1/4
S.A. No.491 of 2018
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Second Appeal abates upon the death of the respondent without inquest finding or knowledge of legal representatives.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A.K.Rajendran and others
- respondent
Dr.P.Elangovan
Coram
P.B. Balaji
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court