Civil miscellaneous petitions sought condonation of a 201-day delay, setting aside abatement caused by the death of the third respondent in a pending second appeal, and impleading the deceased respondent's legal representatives as proposed respondents 14 and 15. The respondents' counsel consented to the orders being passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.Nos.163, 164 and 172 of 2024 in S.A.No.332 of 2017
P.B.BALAJI, J.
These Civil Miscellaneous Petitions has been filed to condone the delay
of 201 days in filing the petition, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 3rd respondent and to bring on record the respondents 11 to 12 as Legal Representatives of the deceased 3rd respondent and array them as proposed respondents 14 and 15 in the above Second Appeal.
2. Mr.V.Sekar, Learned Counsel for the respondents would fairly state that the applications can be ordered.
3. I have gone through the affidavit filed in support of these applications and I am satisfied with the reasons for delay in not taking out the applications in time. Accordingly, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed.
18.03.2024
bsm
Note: Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the cause title. Post this matter on 2nd week of April 2024 filing hearing.
1/2
P.B.BALAJI, J.
bsm
C.M.P.Nos.163, 164 and 172 of 2024 in S.A.No.332 of 2017
18.03.2024
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 201 days in filing the petitions should be condoned and the abatement due to the death of the 3rd respondent set aside so that legal representatives could be brought on record in
P.B.Balaji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
