Dismissed

Tamil Nadu Judicial v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC8 Nov 2024REV.APLW/207/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Review application filed by Tamil Nadu Judicial Employees Association against an order dismissing a writ petition regarding revision of pay scales. The single judge held that the earlier impugned order did not constitute an error warranting review, as it allowed employees to approach competent authorities based on their eligibility and applicable rules.

What did the court decide?

The Review Petition is dismissed as no error apparent on record was established to warrant interference by the Court.

Tamil Nadu Judicial Vs the State of Tamil Nadu — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Review Application No.207 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 08.11.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

¶6

Review Application No.207 of 2024

¶7

Tamil Nadu Judicial Employees Association, Rep. By its President, Vellore District.

¶8

... Review Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Finance Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 9.

¶11

2.The Secretary,

¶12

Home (Pay Cell) Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 9.

¶13

3.The Principal District Judge, Vellore.

¶14

4.The Registrar General, High Court, Madras, High Court Buildings, Chennai – 600 104. ... Respondents

¶15

Prayer: Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 r/w Section 114 of Code of Civil Procedure, to review the order passed in W.P.No.22354 of 2017, dated 21.03.2024 and direct the respondents to fix the petitioners association https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 1 of 4

¶16

Review Application No.207 of 2024

¶17

members in the scale of pay of Rs.975-25-1150-30-1660 i.e., Rs.1025/- with effect from 01.06.1988 and consequential benefits.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Prabakar

¶19

ORDER

¶20

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. ) The Review petition on hand has been instituted by the Tamil Nadu

¶21

Judicial Employees Association represented by its President, who is the petitioner in W.P.No.22354 of 2017.

¶22

The Writ Petition was filed for revision of scale of pay. With reference to the relief sought for, the Division Bench of this Court in the case of K.A.Baskaran Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others¹ passed an order on 17.07.2008 in W.P.No.5969 of 2008. Since the issues relating to revision of pay had been settled by the Division Bench of this Court, the Writ Petition filed by the Review Petitioner was disposed of, by making an observation that there is no impediment for the competent Authorities/learned Principal District Judge to consider the cases of the employees as per Rues in force and based on their eligibility. Regarding fixation of pay, the eligibility is to be considered with reference to Pay Rules as applicable to the employee concerned. The said

¶23

direction would not provide any cause for filing the present Review petition.

¶24

1 CDJ 2008 MHC 3315 Page 2 of 4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

Review Application No.207 of 2024

¶27

¶28

Since the petitioner has not established any error apparent on

¶29

record warranting interference by this Court in exercise of the powers of review, the present Review Petition stands dismissed.

¶30

[S.M.S., J.] [K.R.S., J.]

¶31

08.11.2024

¶32

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order gd

¶33

¶34

1.The Secretary to Government, The State of Tamil Nadu, Finance Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 9.

¶35

2.The Secretary, Home (Pay Cell) Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 9.

¶36

3.The Principal District Judge, Vellore.

¶37

4.The Registrar General, High Court, Madras, High Court Buildings, Chennai – 600 104.

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

Page 3 of 4

¶40

Review Application No.207 of 2024

¶41

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND K.RAJASEKAR, J.

¶42

¶43

Review Application No.207 of 2024

¶44

08.11.2024

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 4 of 4

Tamil Nadu Judicial v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tamil Nadu Judicial v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri.N.Kanniah Vs Smt. Jaya Varma Sinha

R.Selvam Vs R.Uma Mageswari

R.Selvam Vs R.Uma Mageswari

Tamil Nadu Judicial Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

A. Devanbu, Vs Mrs. P.Subha Nandhini, B.Sc.

Vijaya Mookim Vs the National Highway Authority of India