Single judge order condoning delay in filing a miscellaneous petition and ordering its Numbering without engaging substantive law.
Delay condoned; Miscellaneous Petition stands ordered; Registry to number the Review Application if otherwise in order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.M.P.No.34269 of 2024 in Rev.A.SR.No.85107 of 2024
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and
K.RAJASEKAR, J.
[Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. ]
In view of the reasons stated in the
accompanying affidavit filed in support of this
miscellaneous petition, delay is condoned.
Petition stands ordered.
[S.M.S., J.] [K.R.S., J.] 08.11.2024
gd
Note: Registry is directed to number the Review Application, if it is otherwise in order.
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
K.RAJASEKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
