The court condoned the delay in filing the review application based on reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit and stood the miscellaneous petition ordered.
Condonation of delay and the miscellaneous petition stands ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.M.P.No.22331 of 2024 in
Rev.A.SR.No.7373 of 2024
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and
K.RAJASEKAR, J.
[Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. ]
In view of the reasons stated in the
accompanying affidavit filed in support of this
miscellaneous petition, delay is condoned.
Petition stands ordered.
[S.M.S., J.] [K.R.S., J.] 08.11.2024
gd
Note: Registry is directed to number the Review Application, if it is otherwise in order.
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
K.RAJASEKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
