Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

V.G.Selvaraj Vs Vgp Babudas — Partition | Madras HC (2024)

Home
Madras HC
2024
V.G.Selvaraj Vs Vgp BabudasV.G.Selvaraj v. Vgp Babudas

Dismissed

V.G.Selvaraj v. Vgp Babudas

Madras HC18 Jan 2024CS/64/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Suit for partition of immovable properties dismissed as settlement reached between parties. Court Fee refund directed to plaintiffs.

What did the court decide?

Suit dismissed; Court Fee refunded to plaintiffs; no costs.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

C.S.No.64 of 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 18.01.2024

CORAM

THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

C.S.No.64 of 2020

&

O.A.No.101 of 2020

Mr.V.G.Selvaraj Rep. by his Power Agent Mr.V.G.S.Vinodh Raj

Mr.V.G.Vinodh Raj

Mr.V.G.S.Bharath Raj Rep. by his Power Agent Mr.V.G.S.Vinodh Raj

Mrs.S.Vatchaladevi Rep. by her Power Agent Mr.V.G.S.Vinodh Raj

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Mr. V.G. Selvaraj and Others
respondent
Mr. VGP Babudas and Others

Coram

AI extract

N.Sathish Kumar

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 18 Jan 2024 · January
Registered: 12 Feb 2020
Case no.: CS/64/2020

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from N. Sathish Kumar

Will (5) of Mr.S.Radhakrishnan Vs Mrs.Sheila Nair
12 Jan 2024
Santhamma and 7 others Vs v.Chandrasekar
12 Jan 2024
Avanti Sukumar Vs No Respondent
12 Jan 2024
A.U.Anisha and another Vs J.Muthulakshmi and 3 others
18 Jan 2024

Cite this judgement

V.G.Selvaraj v. Vgp Babudas, CS/64/2020 (MAD), decided on 18 January 2024.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

N.Sathish Kumar

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Suit dismissed; Court Fee refunded to plaintiffs; no costs.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Suit filed for division of immovable properties by metes and bounds dismissed. Parties submitted that the dispute was settled out of court. Connected application closed. No costs awarded. Registry directed to refund Court Fee to plaintiffs as per law.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

.. Plaintiffs

Vs.

Mr.VGP Babudas

Mr.VGP Ravidas

Mr.VGP Rajadas

Mr.VGP Prasadas

1/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.S.No.64 of 2020

Mr.VGP Murphydas

Mrs.Shanthi Gnanasekar

Mrs.Usha Rajkumar

Mrs.Jayanthi Selvamanikam

Mr.V.G.Santhosam

Mr.V.G.Rajesh 11. Mrs.Latha David 12. Mrs.Elizabeth Rani Jesuraj

Mrs.Selvi Julian

Mrs.Amudha Rajan .. Defendants

Civil Suit filed under Order IV Rule 1 of Original Side Rules 1956 read with Order VII Rule 1 CPC praying for the following judgment and decree against the defendants.

A] To divide the immovable properties described in the Schedule – A

into eight equal shares by metes and bounds with reference to good and bad soil and allot one such share to second and third plaintiff.

b] To divide the immovable properties described in the schedule - B into three equal shares by metes and bounds with reference to good and bad soil and allot one such share to Mrs.S.Vatchaladevi, late Mrs.P.Parijatham and Late Mrs.S.Philomanal respectively.

2/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.S.No.64 of 2020

c] To divide the 1/3^rd share of late Mrs.P.Parijatham in the schedule –

B properties and allot 1/24^th share to the defendants 1 – 8 being the lineal

descendants of late Mrs.P.Parijatham.

d] To divide the 1/3^rd share of the later Mrs.S.Philomanal in the schedule – B properties and allot 1/9^th share to 9^th defendant being the husband and allot 2/45^th share to the defendants 10-14^th being the lineal descendants of late Mrs.S.Philomanal.

e) directing the defendants to pay costs of the suit

For Plaintiffs : Ms.Shruthi Srinivasan

For defendants : Mr.Balamurali

for M/s.Sivakumar & Suresh

D1 to D5, D8 & D9

Mr.B.Karthikeyan – D6

Mr.Karthikeyan Sekar – D7

Mr.R.Saravanakumar – D10

Mr.B.Deepak Narayanan – D11, 13, 14 D12 – unserved

J U D G M E N T

This suit has been filed divide the immovable properties described in

the Schedule – A and B by metes and bounds with reference to good and

3/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.S.No.64 of 2020

bad soil and allot respective share to the second and third plaintiff and to the

defendants and for costs.

When the matter is taken up today, the learned counsel for the

plaintiffs and the defendants submitted that the dispute between the parties has been settled out of Court and also made an endorsement to that effect. The learned counsel for the plaintiffs also requested that the Court Fee paid may be refunded.

Accordingly, this suit is dismissed as settled out of Court. Consequently connected application is closed. No costs. The registry is directed to refund the Court Fee as per law to the plaintiffs.

18.01.2024

vrc

4/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.S.No.64 of 2020

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

vrc

C.S.No.64 of 2020

18.01.2024

5/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CNR

HCMA010044962020

Topic

Bench

N. Sathish Kumar

Disposal

DISMISSED

Aashutoshbagdi and Another Vs nil

18 Jan 2024

A.N.Unnirajan Vs No Respondent

18 Jan 2024