Subramani, v. Vairavan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a civil revision petition filed under Article 226 on the grounds that it became infructuous as the matter was settled out of court between the parties.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
C.R.P(MD)No.598 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATE : 18.03.2024
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
C.R.P.(MD)No.598 of 2018
1.Subramani
2.Balakrishnan : Petitioners/Petitioners/Defendants
Vs.
Vairavan : Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff
Prayer : This Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order, dated 22.09.2017 in I.A.No.1037 of 2015 in O.S.No.9 of 2008 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kulithalai.
For Petitioners : Mr.K.Govindarajan For Respondent : No appearance
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Subramani
- petitioner
Balakrishnan
- respondent
Vairavan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court